are two competing causes for the recent global warming trend.
first possible cause is based on a theory which
followed the warming trend that
occurred between 1975 and 1998.
second cause is based on highly
correlated data going back thousands
Most agree that the
global temperature has increased about 0.6 - 0.7 Centigrade over
the last century and that the level of CO2 or Carbon
Dioxide a greenhouse gas has been increased in the
atmosphere by 25-30% from pre industrial values.
first theory, which is the generally
accepted one, is that the release of
greenhouse gases from the burning of
fossil fuel and from land use is
responsible for the resent
second theory is that variations in
the Sun's magnetic field and the
solar wind modulate the amount energy
that the earth receives. This is
caused by variations cloud cover and
how much water vapor there is in the
atmosphere which regulates the
Let's look at
Fig 1. Changes in C14 concentration during the last 1000
C14 or Carbon 14 which is created from
cosmic radiation is the isotope which is best known as the
isotope that archeologists use for dating biological
archeological artifacts. The change in the C14
concentration in the atmosphere is dominated by variations
in solar activity. When the solar activity is high the
production of C14 is low, this is due to the shielding
effect of the solar wind against cosmic rays.
Note here that the axis for the C14
concentration has been reversed. What we then can see is
that the curve closely correlates to what is historical
known about the major climate events from the last 1000
The Maunder minimum refers to the period
1645-1715 when very few sunspots were observed on the sun.
In this period the concentration of C14 was higher in
agreement with a low solar activity.
The sharp drop for C14 during the 20th
century is caused by the Suess effect. This effect is due
from the burning of fossil fuels which lack C14.
Complicating the picture, Carbon14 was also produced by
nuclear bomb tests during the cold war.
Fig 2.Solar proxies Beryllium-10 and
Because of the Suess effect, the ratio of
Carbon-14 in relation to other Carbon isotopes becomes
contaminated with the Carbon released from burning of
fossil fuels after 1900. The C14 variation in the
atmosphere as a correct indicator of cosmic radiation is
less reliable after the start of industrialization.
However Beryllium-10, another isotope
doesn't suffer from this effect and is therefore a better
indicator of the variations of cosmic radiation for the
20th century. Here again the graph is reversed and you can
also see its correlation to the sunspot numbers. From the
graph it becomes clear that the amount of Be-10 have been
steadily decreasing during the last hundred years
indicating a decrease of the cosmic radiation and a more
active Sun. The Berrylium-10 is easily dissolved in water
and this record is from Greenland ice cores. The half life
time of Be10 is about 1.5 million years.
Fig 3. Climate history according to IPCC
From these graphs it becomes obvious
that variations in the Sun’s solar wind and magnetic
activity are a major contributor to variations in the
Although we have recordings of the
variations in the climate from both historical as well as
from geological records we don't have exact measurements
of the average temperature with any precision. What we
have are rough estimates.
This was the reason that a team led by
geophysicist Michael Mann made attempts to recreate a more
accurate temperature recording of the earth's climate.
Fig 4. Mann's graph is an estimate from
the latest 1000 years temperature variations. Adopted by
This graph is the so called Hockey Stick
graph that Michael Mann et.al. created. This graph implies
that the temperature variations were relative stable
during the period between year 1000 and the year 1900.
After that time it has increased considerably.
This graph was attacked by global warming
skeptics who questioned why they could not find the
Medieval Warm period and the Little Ice Age. The reason is
that the graph is flawed. The graph corresponds much
better to the variation of CO2 than to temperature
on the hockey stick anomalies HERE
Fig 5. This graph shows the relationship
between solar cycle length and the global temperature.
I've added current length up to the later part of 2009 for
solar cycle 23 which also show the estimated temperature
drop during solar cycle 24. The estimate is that this will
cause a drop of about 2 degrees centigrade lower than the
current global temperature. The approximate length of
solar cycle 23 can now be calculated to be about 12.7
A stark correlation for the period
1861-1989 between the sunspot cycle length and the
temperature anomaly of the Northern Hemisphere was
presented by Friis-Christensen and Lassen in 1991. The
temperature data comes from 1995 IPCC. This graph shows
the drastic change our sun is currently undergoing. As you
can see, because the start up of solar cycle 24 was
delayed, the length of solar cycle 23 was 12.7
years. This would translate in a global temperature drop
of 1.2 degree Celsius by 2020, if this correlation still
holds true. Currently the delayed solar cycle 24 is trying
to start up, indicating severe cooling for the coming
Fig 6. Shows the flux of high energy cosmic
rays reaching Earth. Red line - annual averages. The blue
line is an 11 yr average
The ion chambers at ground level are
sensitive to high energy particles. These particles are
from cosmic radiation and originate from supernova
explosions with several 10's of GeV. These are the
particles responsible for the formation of low altitude
cover of clouds. The ionization of the upper atmosphere is
mainly caused by lower energy particles originating from
the Sun. Plot redrawn using data from Ahluwalia (1997).
Also, the decrease in high energy cosmic
rays since the 1970's are less pronounced from low energy
solar activity, which means that changes in Be10 or direct
solar activity are less accurate in quantifying the solar
-> cosmic ray -> climate link and its contribution to 20th
century global warming. This lack of clear correlation
from the solar wind and low energy cosmic radiation during
the last decades have been used by some climatologists to
try debunk solar climate connections.
Fig 7. Correlation between high energy
cosmic radiation and low cloud cover.
The cosmic ray flux as measured by Neutron
count monitors at low magnetic latitudes. The low altitude
cloud cover is taken from ISCCP satellite data sets, by
Marsh & Svensmark, 2003.
However after my
own investigation by using
an Artificial Neural Network I get revelation that no
statistical correlation can be seen between galactic
cosmic rays and the global temperature. Instead I find
clear detectable correlations between solar wind and
magnetic variations to the global temperature.
Another interesting method to monitor the
earth's energy balance has been made by a group at CALTECH
with a simple and effective method. They have monitored
The Earth's Albedo (The Earth's sunlight
reflectivity), by monitoring the light intensity from the
dark side of the Moon. By doing this they can measure the
light variations that the Earth is emitting out into
space, and thus calculate variations of the amount of
light energy the Earth is absorbing from the Sun.
They have come up with some rather
First, the variation in the Albedo which
changes as a function of variation of the cloud cover on
the Earth seems to be much greater than expected.
Secondly, this variation is much greater
than can be expected from the calculated impact that only
greenhouse gases would bring.
Thirdly, The variations of the Albedo
follow variations of the Earth temperature that have been
registered by satellites. This strongly indicated that it
is variations in the Earth's cloud cover which is the main
cause for climate change and not variation in levels of
This study seem to strengthening the
hypothesis that variation in solar activity is the main cause for climate changes and
weaken the hypothesis that anthropogenic greenhouse gases
play a major part in present climate change put forward by
I would prefer to call the global warming
promoting climatologists as "thermodynamic
fundamentalists", those who believe that the main driver
in climate change are variations in the levels of heat and
cool trapping trace gases.
To better understand the controversy over
global warming it is necessary to also understand why most
climatologists believe it is the
of greenhouse gases in the atmosphere which are
causing the current temperature increase.
Important decisions of what will happen
with the climate in the coming decade are made right
now..!! Not by any climatologist, not by politicians,
not even by the IPCC, not by you and me..., but by the
Yes, by the Sun!!
Currently the Sun is at solar maxima. Yet
this solar maxima has the lowest activity of the last 200
years level currently displaying only a few sunspots.
There exist a close relationship between
the length of a sunspot cycle and the earth's temperature
as displayed in figure 5.
All solar physicists are now looking with
intense interest for the sun's next move.
We are near or we have already past the
Solar Cycle 24 maximum.
The start of the new solar cycle, solar
cycle 24 was severely delayed. It was supposed to start in
January 2007, but it didn't start until the end of 2009.
From the relationship between the Sun Spot Cycle length
and the temperature, one can calculate that by each day
the start of the next Solar Cycle is delayed, that that
extra day's delay corresponds to about 1.4 thousand of a
degree centigrade cooling of the Earth's climate. With
the appearance of the first sunspot of solar cycle 24in
early 2008, this would cool the Earth by about 0.5 degree
centigrade during the coming Solar Cycle. This would have
been the case if this solar cycle would have started at
the same time as the first new sunspot of the new solar
The problem is that this wasn't the case.
The cooling of the Earth can now be estimated to be about
1.6 degree centigrade.
In either case we should expect the earth's
mean temperatures to drop to levels not seen since the
Little Ice Age within the next solar cycle.
What is happening right now signal a
drastic shifts in the Earth's climate and we will likely
see dramatic drops in temperature the coming decades,
starting in the next coming years.
The well known 11 year Solar Cycle is not
the only Solar Cycle. In fact there are several cyclical
Solar Cycles working on longer time scales. It has been
well known among solar physicists for a long time that the
combining effect of these cycles will likely cause the
climate to enter a cool phase in the early 21st century.
How deep will this change in climate be?
Nobody knows for certain, but it is now very likely that
it will soon fall to levels that haven't been seen since
the time of "The Little Ice Age".
Real time image
of the current state of the Sun. This is maybe the
scariest image on the Internet at the moment, if
you consider the impact this view will have for the people
on the Earth! Right now the Sun's activity is
low and you will only see few sunspots, yet the Sun is
currently at or near solar maxima. This have now put the global temperature
of the Earth in a state of free fall. This solar slowdown,
the most important climate change news of our time,
has so far been heavily censured by the mass media. Why?
It's because if this was better known by the general
public, it would create severe doubt in the propaganda
messages delivered by the global warming industry and from
the mass media.
The cause for this cooling, I believe after
looking at the science, is that it is caused by variation
in cosmic radiation. Because the Solar Cycle right now is
longer than normal, the Sun is spending more time in a low
solar activity state. This means that lower solar activity
Earth's atmosphere which probably creates more clouds
which reflects away more of the Sun's warming sunlight.
Other effects from the Sun are also at play affecting the
jet streams to move closer to the equator. The
result is that the Earth cools. And because this cooling
phase occurs over a longer time than normal, the climate
will change. There is going to be a time lag of this
cooling affecting the oceans.
Therefore this effect will come gradually over time during
the next decade.
Although most climatologists are unaware
that the climate might turn to a much cooler phase, the
two theories for climate change, human caused global
warming and climate change caused by variation on cloud
cover and the jet stream is going to meet each other head to head in a few years time.
At that time, based on more reliable data,
we will have a much better knowledge and understanding of
the real causes for the recent as well as future climate
New Jupiter sized planets are now
repeatedly found around nearby stars. The method they use
to discover planets is by observing small movements in the
Doppler Shift of the light emitted from those stars.
Our star, the Sun is also affected by large
planets and wobbles back and forth by gravitational
forces. The notion that the Sun is centered at a stable
position in the center of the Solar System is therefore
As the four large planets Jupiter, Saturn,
Uranus and Neptune orbit in their orbits around the Sun
they drag the Sun around at the center of the Solar System
with irregular movements. The Sun is made of hot plasma
and rotates with the highest rotation at the equator but
slower at the poles.
As we know from physics, rotating gyros
which are moved around wobbles. The same thing is true
with the Sun, which is filled with plasma, magnetic fields
and rotates. As a result, if the Sun is accelerated around
fast, great internal forces act on the interior of the Sun
which contains strong internal magnetic fields. This
causes sunspots to appear and Solar Flares to erupt. On
the other hand, if the movements on the Sun are small, less
Solar activity manifest itself and the Sun goes into a
Based on this theory, an amateur Solar
Dr. Theodor Landscheidt have studied the Sun's
movements resulting from the gravitational pull from those
planets and linked them to the observed larger solar
cycles. He has also calculated periods with high and with
low solar activities based in the Sun's movements.
The next period with low solar activity has
now started and should reach its deepest point around
2030. It has already started to manifest itself already
during this solar cycle, Solar Cycle 24. The solar
activity of Solar Cycle 24 is about half of that of the
previous cycle. He did calculate that this period will be
of a Maunder type event. The current low activity is going
result in lower temperatures, but because of the time lag
caused by the oceans we have not seen noticeable drops in
temperatures until now.
The great irony or to be more exact the
great tragedy is that while a hysterical world is
preparing for a rapid temperature increase, the Earth is
coincidentally heading at the same time for what is
probably the most severe fall in temperature that the
Earth have had experienced for several hundreds of years.
for your action!!...
to inform an ignorant and misled world of the
imminent rapid global cooling trend and its
It is now unequivocal that we are
now at the beginning of a 20 year rapid cooling climate
change event which is going lower the global temperature down
to the same levels which existed during the Little Ice Age
between the 14th and 19th century.
is now unequivocal that a drastic global cooling
awaits us. Unless the laws of physics has become
suspended or the long awaited, but so far absent global
warming miraculously appears and reduces the cooling
It is likely that the cooling is going to be of a
Maunder minimum type event, which existed during the
coolest phase of the "Little Ice Age", and that the
coolest temperature level is expected to be reached around
Now it's time for activism, to reduce the
number of coming victims from
to stop the madness and tell the world about the
real climate change threat, so that the right preparation
can be made... The real threat... Not imaginary global
Already millions upon millions of people in
poor countries risk starvation
when the world's food production soon will be reduced as a consequence of the colder climate. They
received this sentence as a direct result of the many
catastrophic misguided decisions that were made in Kyoto
and the following UN climate meetings.
Send letters to your local newspaper, radio or TV station
or contact your political representatives. Break the
global warming controlled news media censorship on the
Sun's now dramatically reduced solar activity and the
coming impact this will have on the Earth's
climate and on human living conditions.
1979-2015 Human Caused Global Warming
Of Unstoppable Global Cooling Caused By The Waning
Dearly missed by close friends!
Al Gore, James Hansen, Michael Mann, Gavin
Schmidt, Phil Jones, The Carbon Traders, The
Climatology Computer Modeling Community, The
Corporate Mass Media, WWF, Greenpeace, Sierra
Club, Investment Firms on Wall Street, The
Political Leaders Of The World and The IPCC!
The global warming drenched mass media are
promoting the idea that
global warming is the greatest challenge mankind have ever
faced and that now is time for drastic action to stop
the rapid increase in temperatures. The global warming
hysterical media also also reporting repeatedly of the record
low ice cover in the Arctic and the open passage of the
North West Passage. They forget to tell you that the
Arctic went through a similar warm period between 1920 and
1950 and the the climate in the Arctic is very variable.
An inconvenient truth is that a clear
climate shift has already started. We see this for example
in two of the poster children from the Nobel prize winner
Al Gore's movie.
The glaciers on Mount Kilimanjaro have
started to increase.
Lake Chad in 2001, allegedly drying up as a
result of human caused global warming.
Lake Chad in 2007, clip taken from Google
map in October 2007 after the monsoon. Oops!!
The water in the lake is back!!
Right Now The World Is Heading For A
Combined Natural And Manmade
The Sun's activity is now very low. The
recent Solar Cycle
23 was the longest solar cycle for over 200 years and this
is going to result in low activity of the Solar Cycles 24 and 25.
The low solar activity during the transition between Solar
Cycle 23 and 24 took 3 years
instead of the usual 1 year.
The result of this is that instead of the
normal one year cooling of the Earth during this
transition, this time the cooling will continue during 3
full years. This is going to cause a rapid drop of Earth's
average temperature over the next coming years and
initiate a new "Little Ice Age".
Similar rapid temperature drops have been
well documented from historical records and from
measurements from reliable temperature reconstructions.
They are all linked by the same type of abrupt change in
the solar motion. These changes in the solar motions occur
at predictable and regular intervals driven by the
changing gravitational forces from the solar system's big
The current lower solar activity and the
associated drop in temperatures are now right on schedule
based on the current changes in the solar motion and its
strong correlation with Earth's climate which have been
well known by a few individuals who have studied this
Unfortunately this very important climatic
effect has not been in the scientific mainstream and has
been suppressed or ignored by the climatology community.
The global warming brainwashed news media
have so far censured the fact that the Sun is now unusual
inactive, that the periods of inactivity happens at
regular interval and that these periods of solar
inactivity all cause severe cooling on the Earth.
Except for a few people active in forums
dedicated to solar physics there seem to be very few who
have been able to connect the dots between the current low
solar activity, the drop in temperatures and that we are
fast approaching the same conditions that existed during
solar minima during the "Little Ice Age".
In 2008 the price for wheat and corn
reached record high levels and the supply was very low.
Similar events in the near future are likely.
There were several reasons for this!
More wealth in China and India have
increased demand in those countries as more people have
changed their food habit to include more meat.
Freak weather had lowered food production
in many parts of the worlds. Many of these events had been
caused by the initial phase from the current global
cooling. These of course were claimed by the global
warming fundamentalists to be caused by global warming.
However how freak snow and frost events in warm places
were caused by global warming...Beats me!
The transition from food production to
bio-fuel production have greatly reduced available area
for food farming in North America, one of the most food
productive area in the world and essential for the world's
On the emerging food crisis. An interview
with Peter Taylor an environmental scientist and former
environmental advisor to the UN.
We don't know exactly how fast and how
severe this cooling will be. There is now a real risk that
the next solar cycle 25 will be as inactive as those during
the Maunder Minimum, given the current already very low
Hopefully it is only going to be a repeat
of a Dalton type minimum, which is bad enough.
The coming solar minimum is called
The Landscheidt minimum
and many also want to call it The Gore Minimum, after the
former US vice president, the best known promoter and
businessman in the global warming disaster industry.
In either case, even if the World Community
is preparing for global cooling and try to compensate food
production in order to meet the reduction in arable land
and the associated reduction in crop yield this will
likely turn out to be a difficult task.
Right now, not only is the World totally
unaware of the coming global cooling. In an effort to
fight imaginary global warming, policies have been
implemented which in reality greatly reduces food
These policies are opposite to what they
should be in order to reduce the risk of devastating
famines among people living in the third world.
Will the World be able to adapt food
production to the reality of rapid global cooling when the
real cold sets in, despite the current policies to fight
global warming? Or Will the policies implemented by
Al Gore et. al., the eco pseudo scientists, the misguided
politicians and all the others that have tried to cash in
on the swindle make them the famine creators?
In any case, it is urgent that the reality
of global cooling will be recognized fast so that the
world leaders can implement the right decisions as early
as possible instead of continuing with the catastrophic
polices they are doing now.
The reduction in food production will
affect temperate regions including US and Canada in North
America. It will also affect temperate regions in Europe,
Russia, Ukraine and China. All important food production
We know from historical records that during
solar minima, in these regions, the growth seasons were
reduced, less sunshine was received and more rainfall
fell during summers.
It is known from
historical records that during these solar cold snaps,
the monsoons over the Indian subcontinent become reduced
and in some cases, is failing. This effect is
simultaneously affecting all monsoon activity regions in
the tropics. Lower temperatures results in less water
vapor in the atmosphere.
This reduction in rainfall does not start
immediately. Instead it is manifested first when the air
and water temperature over the Pacific and over the Indian
Ocean have dropped as the World cools. This is not a large
drop in temperature, but the drop in temperature still
tends to lower the amount of water vapor in the tropics
which then cause drop in rainfalls.
The reduction in the monsoons is more
common when the temperature is at the lowest point during
solar minima. It is also in effect when the temperature
rebounds and the earth starts the warm up again at the end
of the solar minima when the Sun once again becomes more
So what likely will happen is that first
the food production in the food baskets of North America
and Eurasia will be reduced. Then this is followed by a
reduction of the harvests in the tropics, in countries
like India, China and Brazil 5 to 10 years later, while at
the same time the food production in the temperate regions
of the World will continue to stay low.
You like Wind Farms?
reason to be concerned about possible
future human caused catastrophic global
warming, if at least one of these two
If the mean global
temperature shows sign of increasing
at a rate which is
above normal natural temperature variations.
If there is credible
research which shows by
actual measurements that the
added and expected future increase of CO2
from human activity
dangerous global warming.
What do the data tell us?
Over the 16 years there
has been no increase in global temperature.
The greenhouse effect
from CO2 and Methane, the two most important
greenhouse gases that are affected by human
activity, are dwarfed compared to the
dominant greenhouse gas which is water
vapor. Most scientists on both side of the
issue estimate that a doubling of CO2,
something which could be expected at the end
of the century, can only increase the global
temperature by about one degree Celsius.
This is the calculated warming if no
feedback effect exist of any sort. To get
dangerous global warming there must exist a
feedback from CO2 on water vapor. This
feedback is also known as the climate
sensitivity. This is the real Holy Grail or
the Achilles’ heel of the global warming
theory. In other words, if CO2 increase,
which in itself only causes is small
warming, it must also be followed by an
strong increase in air humidity "water
vapor" which adds extra warming from the
greenhouse effect, to cause dangerous
warming. A strong positive feedback is rare
in nature and if it would exist for the
atmosphere it would cause the climate to be
very unstable which is not seen. Another
problem for the theory is that the
greenhouse effect from CO2 is almost fully
saturated. Any added extra greenhouse
warming from CO2 increase when the level
already is high becomes smaller and smaller.
So far, no research have ever shown
convincingly with actual measurements that
there exist a strong positive feedback
between CO2 and water vapor. In fact now
instead there exist credible research which
show that this relationship is negative and
probably strongly negative making any
influence on the climate from CO2 increase,
Neither condition has been shown to be true!
One of the complaint put
forward by the proponents of the human caused
global warming catastrophe theory is that the
so called "climate change skeptics", those who
believe that climate change is indeed
occurring and is the result of largely natural
causes are irrational or have sinister motives
by spreading doubt on "the scientific fact
from the IPCC" that humans caused global
warning is creating dangerous warming and that
they therefore are obstructing necessary
action to stop this warming by limiting cheap
something which should be very easy for the
global warming scientists to solve. I'm sure
that if they can produce credible research
which show together with actual measurements
that there exist a strong positive feedback
between CO2 and water vapor, most climate
change skeptical scientists would change side.
Yes, there are scientists skeptical of
dangerous human caused global warming. Lots of
Given the severity of this
threat and in view of the huge amounts which
have been used for climate research it seems
to me deeply irresponsible by the scientists
that they have not presented any such result.
Of course the obvious reason
that they have not been able do that, is
because the strong positive feedback isn't
there and the threat of catastrophic global
warming therefore doesn't exist.
The only proofs, claimed by
climatologists, are from computer models which
all assume a strong positive feedback These
strong positive feedbacks are not supported by
Ask your politician or better
yet the climate scientists. Please give us
proof that the climate sensitivity is strongly
positive. Don't take no for an answer, demand
real proof. After all, what they demand are
giant changes in the way we live, how we get
our energy and they demand changes which are
not cheap and there are no easy available
alternatives. Inevitable this will led to less
prosperity, more poverty and ultimately famine
for people that now live in poverty.
warming is big business
Global warming or climate
change as it is now known, has become big
business for high finance, employing thousands
of people in business ventures, political and
economical think tank groups and in lobbying
One such lobbying and pressure
group composed of wall street financial firms
working for the new low carbon economy is
Low Carbon Economy is
the new marketing and branding label for
fossil fuel rationing, taxation and trading
schemes, as this label invokes subliminal
guilt in the general public. The term
developed by image and marketing consultants
becomes associated with a healthy low carbon
diet and envision pictures of fewer dirty coal
mines. This is a much better term than
previous used terms, such as global warming,
climate change or carbon dioxide pollution,
for making more people convinced that carbon
dioxide, one of two of Earth's life giving
gases, is a hazardous pollutant.
report on Climate Money from researcher
Joanne Nova looks at this aspect of the well
funded global warming industrial complex.
Global warming fears have now caused the US to
spend over 79 billion dollars of public
taxpayers money on climate change research and
policies since 1989.
It was in Copenhagen the
real new actions to stop global warming was
intended to be set in movement. There, UN dignitaries, climate
bureaucrats, climate activist, the world's
media and the leaders of the world did
converge in the Danish capital of Copenhagen
where they tried to replace the Kyoto
protocol, but failed. This meeting was
appropriately located to Copenhagen as this
was also the same city in which the author H.
C. Andersen wrote the novel "The Emperor's New
The time is now short for
firm international action to combat global
warming as more and more climatologists now
start to realize that things are even worse,
for them that they previously thought.
Their worst nightmares are now coming true.
The world is now cooling and it will continue
to cool. They can't hide this anymore and now
with ClimateGate they have been caught
One of the world's leading
climate model expert, Mojib Latif, who also is
one of the lead authors of the IPCC, now had
to reluctantly admit that the world is likely
to cool for the next decade or two.
But, then he claims, just
wait, until then. When this period is over,
then the global warming catastrophe will soon
For us, who have looked into
climate science and the collegial culture of
today’s climate scientists, the reached
conclusion has been for a long time that their
science is based on a subjective and agenda
driven science as opposed to a an objective
and truth seeking science quest.
On 20th of November 2009 a
bomb reached the blogosphere. One of the main
scientific institution which have been
promoting global warming hysteria, The Climate
Research Unit at the University of East Anglia
CRU had been hacked and huge volumes of stored
emails and data files were released on to the
We know this information is
genuine. The huge volume of data exposes the
overall mindsets of the most influential
scientists which control this field. The same
people have also achieved full control of the
IPCC scientific process.
Here is what retired
climatologist Tim Ball has to say about the
emerging ClimateGate, the greatest scientific
scandal of all time.
This have so far been revealed from the emails
and data files of what this closed group of
psychopathic climate scientists have been up
-This group have taken full
control of the peer review process by
intimidating editors of scientific journals
which publish articles questioning to the AGW
theory, by making sure all the peer reviewers
belong to them and by personal attacking
critical scientists instead of debating the
science with them.
- Attempts have been made to
block sharing of scientific data and
temperature data and to obstruct freedom of
- They have fiddle with data
and graphs in an effort to reduce historical
variability and to hide recent global
- By trying to prove and
convince politicians and the media of one
particular scientific theory "The catastrophic AGW
theory", they have resorted to a culture of
subjective agenda driven science and political
activism. And of course, this is not
We have been told repeatedly
by the media that the IPCC is a scientific
organization which is composed of 2500 of the
best climate scientists in the world and that
they have reached a consensus view that human
caused global warming is real and that it will
be catastrophic if we don't dramatically
reduce our use of fossil fuels. This
claim that there is a consensus reached by
2500 climate scientists at the IPCC is one
of the biggest lies of the global warming
propaganda and is
the main reason so many people have been taken
in by this monstrosity of scam. The
second biggest lie is that there exist strong
evidence for the potential for dangerous human
caused global warming. The imagined picture
most people have of IPCC is that there are
2500 climate scientists that get together at
huge meetings at exotic locations, have
deliberations and that they then vote on this
issue. This is totally wrong.
The reality of the IPCC is
quite different. IPCC is a politically
controlled organization under the UN. Of the
2500 involved scientists, not all are
scientists, many are governmental bureaucrats
and environmental activists. Only about 20% of
those involved have any scientific knowledge
of climate science or physics. The reason for
this is that most of the assessments are made
for other aspects based on the scientific
already accepted conclusion that human caused
global warming would create dangerous warming.
The people that are involved in these
assessments are biologist, glaciologists,
economists, health officials, social engineers
and so on.
The science of climate
science in the IPCC is divided into several
parts. A few lengthy scientific parts and one
shorter part called "Summary for policymakers"
which is a kind of executive summary aimed for
politicians and business people. The lengthy
scientific parts say nothing about dangerous
human caused global warming. It only talks
about possible scenarios. The smaller, but
juicier stuff which this group of psychopathic
scientists have had full control of is the
"Summary for policymakers". This is the part
with all the dire predictions. This is the
part that the politician and the activists use
to prove that there exist scientific consensus
for dangerous global warming among the
The reason why they are in
full control of this process is because those
who have been chosen by the IPCC to act as
authors and more importantly, act as the
lead-authors of these important chapters are
the most distinguished scientists in their
fields. By being distinguished in the view,
according to the IPCC, means that those are
the scientists that appear most frequently in
the peer-review (pal-reviewed) literature. And
we now know, who those are! The whole process
is an absolute disgrace and a travesty of
You can learn more here of this misconduct by
Part 1 Lawrence Solomon the author of the
book "The Deniers" talks here about the IPCC
and the peer review process
Some may think that it is
not a big deal that a small group of climate
scientists have behaved badly. Surely, there
are thousand of other climate scientists that
are convinced of dangerous human impact on the
climate. They can't all be wrong?
What is important to realize
here is that this group of scientists are at
the top of the climate scientists' food chain.
These are the people, who apart from
controlling the IPCC, also control the
official temperature data which are used by
the IPCC and by other scientists. Most
scientists in climatology are specialists of
small areas, they are honest, but because this
theory has been accepted as the prevailing
theory for climate change, they don't question it.
Here is an interview with
understand what is going on, it is good to
learn the history of the catastrophic human
caused global warming theory, also called the
CAGW theory which now have led up to
ClimateGate, the greatest scientific scandal
Sometime in the
early 1980ies some scientist became concerned
that increasing levels of CO2 could lead to
dangerous global warming. They did marketing
and lobbying of this hypothesis to politicians
and to influential think tank groups close to
the UN. This led to more funding for climate
research. The IPCC is an UN organization that
was formed in 1988 and its mandate is
exclusively to look for humans influence on
At this time
several things happened. A large number of
researchers often with an interest in the
environmentalism entered this field and
started to do research on humans influence on
climate. Meanwhile temperature started to
increase by about 0.2 centigrade by decade.
Measurement of the incoming heat radiating
from the Sun hitting the Earth measured from
space showed very little variation over time.
These researchers therefore assumed in their
computer simulations that most of the warming
was caused by man. Computer models simulating
the Earth's atmosphere were therefore built
using in-built strong positive feedback from
CO2 on water vapor in order to simulate the
temperature increase. Ice core taken from
Antarctica also showed that changes in
temperature and CO2 followed each other, which
strengthened their arguments.
It was during
this time that things started to go terrible
wrong! These scientists saw this theory as a
ticket for scientific careers, as a way to
increase their fundings, to get fame and above all,
as a mean to do important work by saving the
world. After all, what can be more fulfilling
than to help saving the world by informing the
world of the dangers of dangerous human cased
In this quest,
they lost their sense for scientific
objectivity. Because of this and because they
were convinced of the validity of this theory
they saw the need to emphasize this threat and
to make the validity of this theory more
believable. Next step was to stop other
scientists with different viewpoints from the
scientific discussion by blocking them out
from peer review journals and to lock them out
from scientific discussions. Then, they
massaged temperature data, to further their
cause. They also adopted assumptions of fudge
relationships and turned them into scientific
the cooling period between 1950 to 1975 was
claimed to be caused by sulfur dioxide
increase from industrialization despite
complete lack of evidence.
The warming toward the end of the 20th century
was claimed to be caused by human activity
while the equal size of the warming at the
beginning of the century was claimed to be
caused by increase in the amount of solar heat
radiation. If that was the case, then the
solar heat increase at the beginning of the
century would have been 30 to 50 times as
strong as that of the end of the century. Then
because so many new researchers entered the
field, the competition among them led to an
arms race between them. The researchers with
the most alarming results were the ones which
got most attention and promotion. In a
historical perspective the result from all
these revelations is that the catastrophic
global warming con will become known as the
"The mother of all scientific frauds".
whole industries were built up around the idea
that the world was warming dangerously caused
by human activity. During the last 20 years,
bio-fuel, the food to fuel scam has been
implemented and have now ratchet up food
prices. This is directly leading to starvation
and malnutrition for millions of peoples in
third world countries. The financial industry
got into the act and they are now among the
most active promoter and lobbyists for global
warming legislation in both Washington and
Brussels. Of course they love the crazy idea
of a CO2 trading system, controlled and put in
place just for them.
Several problems with the theory. Among
- The ice core
records that goes back 400000 years showed
with better resolution that it is temperature
which drives changes in atmospheric CO2 level,
rather than the other way around.
several attempts to confirm heating in the
tropical troposphere. No warming trend has
been found, which is something that should be there according
the global warming theory.
characteristics of the greenhouse effect from
added amounts of CO2 is logarithmic and now
almost fully saturated. The result is that the
added increase in the greenhouse effect from CO2
becomes less and less effective. This means
that while the levels of CO2 has increased by
about 30% from pre-industrial levels, already
it has caused about 70% of the warming forcing
from the expected increase in the greenhouse
effect if the CO2 content from pre-industrial
levels were to double.
positive feedback from CO2 on water vapor has
been measured. This is a prerequisite for
dangerous global warming.
-In order for
dangerous global warming, heating must be
accumulating in the world's oceans. Despite
using an extensive network of special Argo
sea bouys which measures sea temperature at
different depths. No accumulation of heating
has been found, instead they have registered
-There has been
no warming for the last 16 years in the global
Here is an
analysis made by Peter, a six grader assisted
by his dad, over the GISS global temperature
record. GISS is the NASA Goddard Institute for
Space Studies which uses records from
temperature records and where global warming
activists James Hansen is the director.
bombshell is now revealed! Russian weather
stations were cherry picked by the Hadley
Center to create an artificial warming trend
for the 20th century.
important: It is repeatedly claimed
that higher temperatures will lead to more
storms, more intensive rainfalls and more
droughts. In reality, it is the other way
around. It is cooling which would lead to more
storms, more intense rainfalls and more
droughts. The claims in the media and from the
UN cabal that we now have seen more floods,
more droughts and storms, what is now called
extreme weather, is wrong. Of course people
are inclined to believe this because the modern
mass media now covers weather events from all
of the whole
This claim of
more extreme weather was wrong up to about a
few years ago. Now however there is
probably an increase in the frequency of
extreme weather. This is because of the lower
solar activity. The
result should based on historical record is that there would be more
heavy rainfalls and more droughts. Clouds
condenses easier and humid air doesn't travel
as far as before.
Is that the
case today? In my view, looking at the world
weather, I think this is the case. So while
these changes in climate are claimed by the
media and the UN to be caused by human
activity and cause (climate change / global
warming / extreme weather), the real cause of this is from the
current very real changes in solar activity.
Because of the
scientific and media censorship of this
connection between solar activity and
terrestrial climate, this important and real
science influence on the Earth's climate has
been misinterpreted and silenced. This is just
when the changes from this effect is starting
to impact Earth's climate and human lives.
Since the end
of the Little Ice Age the global temperature
trend have alternated between periods of
warming and cooling. The duration of each
interval is about 60 years, coinciding with
variation in solar activity and
cycles. During the warming
periods the warming have been between 0.3-04
degree centigrade and during the cooling
periods the cooling have been about 0.15-0.2
degree centigrade. The warming during the last
warming period between 1975 - 2000 was about
0.3 degree centigrade, but scientists within
the IPCC blame humans for this the latest
warming. During the last decade there has been
no warming trend. Recently even global
warming scientists have admitted that a period
of one decade or two of cooling is likely.
According the CAGW theory, heat should be
accumulate in the oceans, but the reality is
that ocean heat content is not increasing. Does
this constitute overwhelming proof for human
caused dangerous warming? Where is the
and Methane are greenhouse and these gases has
increased in the atmosphere as a result of
human activity. These gases should lead to
some extra warming of the global temperature.
The temperature increased during the 20th
century. Yet, the hypothesis that human
activity would or even can cause dangerous
warming is the biggest scientific swindle ever.
which now has become part of apocalyptic
environmentalism. a new dogma, has some
very peculiar characteristics. In this
discipline, scientific facts are not
established by measurements and observations.
Instead they are based on favorable
assumptions supporting one specific theory. If
there emerge data or observations which run
contrary to these assumptions, then in this
scientific community ignore these findings.
characteristics of the current state of
climatology is the extreme tunnel vision these
scientists have. They have a fundamentalistic
believe that changes in the climate system are
almost exclusively caused by changes in the
composition of the gases in
Earth's atmosphere. The theory they try to
proof is called Catastrophic Anthropogenic
Global Warming CAGW or in plain language
catastrophic human caused global warming. In
reality, what they have tried to prove in
their tunnel vision is that the climate is
almost exclusively controlled by changes in
the amount of trace gases in the atmosphere.
They also add soot, effects from volcanic
eruptions and from changes in the TSI (Total
Solar Irradiance) which is the small
variations of the heat radiation that is
hitting Earth from the Sun. Instead of calling their hypothesis AGW, I suggest that
it should be called Exclusive Atmospheric
Composition Driven Climate Change EACDCC.
Of course they
want to fit or massage their computer
simulations to follow the temperature
variations that are occurring. This has been
more and more difficult, if not right out
impossible. Therefore they have resorted to
massaging the temperature data. Just to give
an illustration, it has been reveled in the
e-mail correspondents that they have suggested
that the none warming and cooling since 2000
could be attributed the increase in pollution
coming from China and India. Of course nothing
can convince them that their theory of CAGW
could be wrong. You see this in almost all
science reporting coming from this community.
Changes are always coming from changing in the
atmospheric composition, never from changes in
ocean currents and absolutely not from changes
in solar activity. The hockey-stick group
peer-review monitoring team has made sure that
papers with that sort of conclusions never get
into any climatic scientific publication.
Bloom, European parliament
Global warming has become a
joke! Even the US President recognizes it
as a hoax!
Are you afraid in the
global warming Armageddon. Don't be!
Why is the mass
media deliberately lying to us?
You are told repeatedly in
the news that the world is rapidly warming,
the ice in Antarctica and in the Arctic is
rapidly melting and that the sea level is
increasing at an accelerating rate.
A Reality check! Few
people seem to be doing this, but any person
with an Internet connection can check out for
themselves from real unbiased satellite data,
the global temperature, the ice cover changes
on both hemisphere and changes in the average
sea level. Its just a few clicks away on the
What does the REAL data
temperature reading of the
lower troposphere from satellite
This graph shows no warming
since 2002 if one filter out the El Niño and
La Niña variations and it shows a cooling
trend since 2007.
This is the
ice cover anomaly in the Arctic ocean.
This graph is
from Wikipedia. The graph shows a steady
sea level rise of about 2-3 millimeters a
year, which has not shown any important
change for over 100 years. No accelerated
increase can be seen and in fact the last
information indicate a slowing down of the
increase during the last two years. This is
probably caused by a reduction in the amount
of absorbed heat from the Sun in the tropics.
The steady increase in this graph is caused by
ocean warming as a result of warming during
the current interglacial period plus an
ongoing warming up from the latest Little Ice
Age. This ocean warming causes thermal
expansion resulting in a steady slow sea level
rise. Contrary to popular believe, this sea
level rise has little to do with any change in
glacier melt, as the water volume melt from
the glaciers during the last 100 years is far
to small to have any measurable impact.
So why doesn't the
mass media report on this?
Here is a recording from the
O'Reilly Factor, Fox News, a TV channel on the
right side on the political spectrum in the
US. On this video claim from some politicians,
from other media and from Greenpeace that the
wildfires in California in 2009 was caused by
global warming is met by meteorologist Joe
Bastardi of Accuweather.
Bastardi debunk claims that the wildfires in
California in 2009 was caused by global
The fact that the so called
free and supposedly objective mass media in
the western world refuses to tell us the facts
that the globe has not warmed for the last 16
years, the ice caps are not melting and that
the sea level rise is not accelerating is
nothing more than mind-boggling. To learn the
facts on climate change shouldn't be a
political issue, but in today's world it
The Global Cooling
Sign up for
The Global Cooling Newsletter! It's FREE
Get informed of what is now happening with
the climate. Get news on the cooling Earth!
Get information on updates on this website and what can be
done to make the world aware of the imminent and severe
cooling the Earth is now starting to undergo.
Your email and name is protected and will
never be given to anyone else, ever. Period!
need your help...!!
Are you sick and tired of all the tabloid
science news reporting in the major news media of "the
human made global warming"?
Do you want people to learn the truth about
Are you against global warming alarmists'
censorship over the close relationship between the Sun's
activity and our climate so they are able to protect their