The causes of global warming and climate change!

It is now unequivocal that we are now at the beginning of a 20 year rapid cooling climate change event which will lower the global temperature down to the same levels which existed during the Little Ice Age between the 14th and 19th century.

I'll repeat...it is now unequivocal that a drastic global cooling awaits us.
Unless the laws of physics has become suspended or the long awaited, but so far absent global warming miraculously appears and reduces the cooling trend.

It is likely that the cooling will be of a Maunder minimum type event, which existed during the coolest phase of the "Little Ice Age", and that the coolest temperature level is expected to be reached around 2030.

Now it's time for activism, to reduce the number of coming victims from starvation, to stop the madness and tell the world about the real climate change threat, so that the right preparation can be made... The real threat... Not imaginary global warming!!

Already millions upon millions of people in poor countries have a death sentence on them by starvation when the world's food production soon will be drastically reduced as a consequence of the colder climate. They received this sentence as a direct result of the many catastrophic misguided decisions that were made in Kyoto and on Bali.

Please!! Send letters to your local newspaper, radio or TV station or contact your political representatives. Break the global warming controlled news media censorship on the Sun's now dramatically reduced solar activity and the coming catastrophic impact this will have on the Earth's climate and on human living conditions.

Support Global Cooling Activism And Prepare For Abrupt Climate Change!

1. If the mean global temperature shows sign of increasing at a rate which is above normal natural temperature variations.
2. If there is credible research which shows by verifiable and actual measurements that the added and expected future increase of CO2 from human activity can cause dangerous global warming.

What do the data tell us?

1. Over the past decade there has been no increase in global temperature. In fact, over the past years the temperature has started to fall.
2. The greenhouse effect from CO2 and Methane, the two most important greenhouse gases that are affected by human activity, are dwarfed compared to the dominant greenhouse gas which is water vapor. Most scientists on both side of the issue estimate that a doubling of CO2, something which could be expected at the end of the century, can only increase the global temperature by about one degree Celsius. This is the calculated warming if no feedback effect exist of any sort. To get dangerous global warming there must exist a strong positive feedback from CO2 on water vapor. This feedback is also known as the climate sensitivity. This is the real Holy Grail or the Achilles’ heel of the global warming theory. In other words, if CO2 increase, which in itself only causes is small warming, it must also be followed by an strong increase in air humidity "water vapor" which adds extra warming from the greenhouse effect. A positive feedback is rare in nature and if it would exist for the atmosphere it would cause the climate to be very unstable. Another problem for the theory is that the greenhouse effect from CO2 is almost fully saturated. Any added extra greenhouse warming from CO2 increase when the level already is high becomes smaller and smaller. So far, no research have ever shown convincingly with actual measurements that there exist a strong positive feedback between CO2 and water vapor. In fact there exist now credible research which show that this relationship is negative and probably strongly negative making any influence on the climate from CO2 increase, benign.

Conclusion! Neither condition has been shown to be true!

One of the complaint put forward by the proponents of the human caused global warming catastrophe theory is that the so called "climate change skeptics", those who believe that climate change is indeed occurring and is the result of largely natural causes are irrational or have sinister motives by spreading doubt on "the scientific fact from the IPCC" that humans caused global warning is creating dangerous warming and that they therefore are obstructing necessary action to stop this warming by limiting cheap energy use.

This is something which should be very easy for the global warming scientists to solve. I'm sure that if they can produce credible research which show together with actual measurements that there exist a strong positive feedback between CO2 and water vapor, most climate change skeptical scientists would change side. Yes, there are scientists skeptical of dangerous human caused global warming. Lots of them.

Given the severity of the threat and in view of the huge amounts which have been used for climate research it seems to me deeply irresponsible by the scientists that they have not presented such results.

Of course the obvious reason that they have not been able do that, is because the strong positive feedback isn't there and the threat of catastrophic global warming therefore doesn't exist.

The only proofs, claimed by climatologists, are from computer models which all assume a strong positive feedback These strong positive feedbacks are not supported by observational measurements.

One such lobbying and pressure group composed of wall street financial firms working for the new low carbon economy is The Climate Group

Low Carbon Economy is the new marketing and branding label for fossil fuel rationing, taxation and trading schemes, as this label invokes subliminal guilt in the general public. The term developed by image and marketing consultants becomes associated with a healthy low carbon diet and envision pictures of less numbers of dirty coal mines. This is a much better term than previous used terms, such as global warming, climate change or carbon dioxide pollution, for making more people convinced that carbon dioxide, one of two of Earth's life giving gases, is a hazardous pollutant.

This report on Climate Money from researcher Joanne Nova looks at this aspect of the well funded global warming industrial complex. Global warming fears have now caused the US to spend over 79 billion dollars of public taxpayers money on climate change research and policies since 1989.

The meeting in Copenhagen is now over. There, UN dignitaries, climate bureaucrats, climate activist, the world media and the leaders of the world did converge in the Danish capital of Copenhagen where they tried to replace the Kyoto protocol, but failed. This meeting was appropriately located to Copenhagen as this was also the same city in which the author H. C. Andersen wrote the novel of "The Emperor's New Clothes".

The time is now short for firm international action to combat global warming as more and more climatologists now start to realize that things are even worse, for them that they previously thought. Their worst nightmares are now coming true. The world is now cooling and it will continue to cool. They can't hide this anymore and now with ClimateGate they have been caught

One of the world's leading climate model expert, Mojib Latif, who also is one of the lead authors of the IPCC, now had to reluctantly admit that the world is likely to cool for the next decade or two.

But, then he claims, just wait, until then. When this period is over, then the global warming catastrophe will soon hit us.

ClimateGate protest. It won't go away!

After 2 weeks of silence since the release of the emails, CBC finally woke up!

Today a whole new denial industry has been established.
This is the mass media controlled ClimateGate denial industry.

ClimateGate!

For us, who have looked into climate science and the collegial culture of today’s climate scientists, the reached conclusion has been for a long time that their science is based on a subjective and agenda driven science agenda as opposed to a an objective and truth seeking science quest.
 

On 20th of November 2009 a bomb reached the blogosphere. One of the main scientific institute which is promoting global warming hysteria The Climate Research Unit at the University of East Anglia CRU had been hacked and huge volumes of stored emails and data files were released on to the Internet.

We know this information is genuine. Of course we don't know if some of the information have been hampered with, although this is unlikely. Nevertheless given the volume of the data we can be quite confident that the information given to us exposes the overall mindsets of the most influential scientists that control this field. The same people have also achieved full control of the IPCC scientific process.

Here is what retired climatologist Tim Ball has to say about the emerging ClimateGate, the greatest scientific scandal of all time.

Here is more views about this from Tim Ball.

Here is a list of the more questionable and reveling emails in their correspondence.

This have so far been revealed from the emails and data files of what this closed group of psychopathic climate scientists have been up to!

-This group have taken full control of the peer review process by intimidating editors of scientific journals which publish articles questioning to AGW theory, by making sure all the peer reviewers belong to them and by personal attacking critical scientists instead of debating the science with them.

- Attempts have been made to block sharing of scientific data and temperature data and to obstruct freedom of information requests. 

- They have fiddle with data and graphs in an effort to reduce historical variability and to hide recent global temperature decline.

- By trying to proof and convince politicians and the media of one particular scientific theory "The catastrophic AGW theory", they have resorted to a culture of subjective agenda driven science and political activism. And of course, that is not science.

We have been told repeatedly by the media that the IPCC is a scientific organization which is composed of 2500 of the best climate scientists in the world and that they have reached a consensus view that human caused global warming is real and that it will be catastrophic if we don't dramatically reduce our use of fossil fuels.  This claim that there is a consensus reached by 2500 climate scientists at the IPCC is one of the biggest lies of the global warming propaganda and is the main reason so many people have been taken in by this monstrosity of scam. The second of the biggest lie is that there exist strong evidence for the potential for dangerous human caused global warming. The imagined picture most people have of IPCC is that there are 2500 climate scientists that get together at huge meetings at exotic locations, have deliberations and that they then vote on this issue. This is totally wrong.

The reality of the IPCC is quite different. IPCC is a politically controlled organization under the UN. Of the 2500 involved scientists, not all are scientists, many are governmental bureaucrats and environmental activists. Only about 20% of those involved have any scientific knowledge of climate science or physics. The reason for this is that most of the assessments are for other aspects based on the scientific already accepted conclusion that human caused global warming would create dangerous warming. The people that are involved in these assessments are biologist, glaciologists, economists, health officials, social engineers and so on.

The science of climate science in the IPCC is divided into several parts. A few lengthy scientific parts and one shorter part called "Summary for policymakers" which is a kind of executive summary aimed for politicians and business people. The lengthy scientific parts say nothing about dangerous human caused global warming. It only talks about possible scenarios. The smaller, but juicier stuff which this group of psychopathic scientists have had full control of is the "Summary for policymakers". This is the part with all the dire predictions. This is the part that the politician and the activists use to prove that there exist scientific consensus for dangerous global warming among the scientists.

The reason why they are in full control of this process is because those who have been chosen by the IPCC to act as authors and more importantly, act as the lead-authors of these important chapters are the most distinguished scientists in their fields. By being distinguished in the view, according to the IPCC, mean that those are the scientists that appear most frequently in the peer-review (peer-censured) literature. And we now know, who those are! The whole process is an absolute disgrace and a travesty of science. You can learn more here of this misconduct by the IPCC!

Some may think that it is not a big deal that a small group of climate scientists have behaved badly. Surely, there are thousand of other climate scientists that are convinced of dangerous human impact on the climate. They can't all be wrong?

What is important to realize here is that this group of scientists are at the top of the climate scientists' food chain. These are the people, who apart from controlling the IPCC, who also control the official temperature data which are used by the IPCC and by other scientists. Most scientists in climatology are specialists of small areas, they are honest, but because this theory has been accepted as the prevailing theory for climate change, they don't questioning it.

Here is an interview with Patrick Michaels

To better understand what is going on, it is good to learn the history of the catastrophic human caused global warming theory, also called the C-AGW theory which now have led up to ClimateGate, the greatest scientific scandal ever.

Sometime in the late 1970ies some scientist became concerned that increasing levels of CO2 could lead to dangerous global warming. They did marketing and lobbying of this hypothesis to politicians and to influential think tank groups close to the UN. This led to more funding for climate research. The IPCC is an UN organization that was formed in 1988 and its mandate is exclusively to look for humans influence on the climate.

At this time several things happened. A large number of researchers often with an interest in the environment entered this field and started to do research on humans influence on climate. The temperature started to increase by about 0.1 centigrade by decade. Measurement of the incoming heat radiating from the Sun hitting the Earth measured from space showed very little variation over time. These researchers therefore assumed in their computer simulations that most of the warming was caused by man. The computer models were therefore built with strong positive feedback from CO2 on water vapor in order to simulate that temperature increase. Ice core taken from Antarctica also showed that changes in temperature and CO2 followed each other, which strengthened their arguments.

It was during this time that things started to go terrible wrong! These scientists saw this theory as their tickets for their career, as a way to increased funding, to get fame and above all, as a mean to do important work by saving the world. After all, what can be more fulfilling than to help saving the world by informing the world of the dangers of dangerous human cased global warming.

In their quest they lost their sense for scientific objectivity. Because of this and because they were convinced of the validity of this theory they saw the need to emphasize the threat and to make the validity of this theory more believable. Next step was to block other scientists with different viewpoints from the scientific discussion by blocking them out from peer review journals and to lock them out from the scientific discussion. Then, they massaged data, to further their case. They also adopted assumptions of fudge relationships and turned them into scientific proven facts.

For example, the cooling period between 1950 to 1975 was claimed to be caused by sulfur dioxide increase despite complete lack of evidence. The warming toward the end of the 20th century was claimed to be caused by human activity while the equal size of the warming at the beginning of the century was claimed to be caused by increase in the amount of solar heat radiation. If that was the case, then the solar heat increase at the beginning of the century would have been 30 to 50 times as strong as that of the end of the century. Then because so many new researchers entered the field, the competition among them led to an arms race between them, The researchers with the most alarming result were the ones which got most attention and promotion.  In a historical perspective the result from all these revelations is that the catastrophic global warming con will become known as the "The mother of all scientific frauds".

Now, a whole industry was built up around the idea that the world was warming dangerously caused by human activity. During the last 20 years, bio-fuel, the food to fuel scam has been implemented and have now ratchet up food prices. This is directly leading to starvation and malnutrition for millions of peoples in third world countries. The financial industry got into the act and they are now among the most active promoter and lobbyists for global warming legislation in both Washington and Brussels. Of course they love the crazy idea of CO2 trading systems controlled and put in place just for them.
 

Then several problems arised with the theory.  Among them are:

- The ice core records that goes back 400000 years showed with better resolution that it is temperature which drives changes in atmospheric CO2 level, rather than the other way around.

-Despite several attempts to confirm heating in the tropical troposphere. No warming trend has been found, which should be there according the global warming theory.

-The physical characteristics of the greenhouse effect from added amounts of CO2 is logarithmic and now almost fully saturated. The result is that the added increased greenhouse effect from CO2 becomes less and less effective. This means that while the levels of CO2 has increased by about 30% from pre-industrial levels, already it has caused about 70% of the warming forcing from the expected increase in the greenhouse effect if the CO2 content from pre-industrial levels were to double.

-No strong positive feedback from CO2 on water vapor has been measured. This is a prerequisite for dangerous global warming.

-In order for dangerous global warming, heating must be accumulating in the world's oceans. Despite using an extensive network of special Argos sea bouys which measures sea temperature at different depths. No accumulation of heating has been found, instead they have registered cooling.

-There has been no warming for the last 10 years in the global temperature.

Here is an analysis made by Peter, a six grader assisted by his dad, over the GISS global temperature record. GISS is the NASA Goddard Institute for Space Studies where global warming activists James Hansen is the director.

More on ClimateGate and the Russian weather stations!

This is important:
It is repeatedly claimed that higher temperatures will lead to more storms, more intensive rainfalls and more droughts. In fact it is the other way around. It is cooling which would lead to more storms, more intense rainfalls and more droughts. The claims in the media and from the UN cabal that we now have see more floods, more droughts and storms, what is now called extreme weather, is wrong. Of course people believe that because of the modern media which cover the whole world.

This claim of more extreme weather was wrong up to about a few years ago.  Now however there is probably an increase in the frequency of extreme weather. This is because of the lower solar activity. Currently, more high energy cosmic radiation is hitting the Earth. The result should be that the average time a water molecule spends in the air is reduced compared to when the cosmic radiation was lower. The result should be that there would be more heavy rainfalls and more droughts. Clouds condense easier and humid air doesn't travel as far as before.

Is that the case today? In my view, looking at the world weather, I think this is the case. So while these changes in climate are claimed by the media and the UN to be caused by human activity and cause climate change "global warming", the real cause of this is from the current real changes in solar activity.

Because of the scientific and media censorship of this connection between solar activity and terrestrial climate, this important and real science influence on the Earth's climate has been misinterpreted and silenced. This is just when the changes from this effect are starting to impact Earth's climate and human lives.

Consider this!

Since the end of the Little Ice Age the global temperature trend have alternated between periods of warming and cooling. The duration of each interval is about 30-40 years, coinciding with the solar Gleissberg cycle. During the warming periods the warming have been between 0.3-04 degree centigrade and during the cooling periods the cooling have been about 0.15-0.2 degree centigrade. The warming during the last warming period between 1975 - 2000 was about 0.3 degree centigrade, but scientists within the IPCC blame humans for this the latest warming. During the last decade there has been no warming trend and lately the temperature has started to fall. Recently even global warming scientists have admitted that a period of one decade or two of cooling is likely. According the CAGW theory, heat should be accumulate in the oceans, but the reality is that ocean heat content is decreasing. Does this constitute overwhelming proof for human caused dangerous warming? Where is the warming?

Conclusion! CO2 and Methane are greenhouse and these gases has increased in the atmosphere as a result of human activity. These gases should lead to some extra warming of the global temperature. The temperature increased during the 20th century. Yet, the hypothesis that human activity would or even can cause dangerous warming is the biggest scientific scam ever. 

Further analysis in The Telegraph

Climatology which now has become part of apocalyptic environmentalism. a new dogma, has some very peculiar characteristics. In this discipline, scientific facts are not established by measurements and observations. Instead they are based on favorable assumptions supporting one specific theory. If there emerges data or observations which are contrary to these assumptions, then in this scientific community these findings are collectively ignored.

Another characteristics of the current state of climatology is the extreme tunnel vision these scientists have. They have a fundamentalistic believe that changes in the climate system are almost exclusively caused by changes in the composition of the gases in Earth's atmosphere. The theory they try to proof is called Catastrophic Anthropogenic Global Warming C-AGW or in plain language catastrophic human caused global warming. In reality, what they have tried to prove in their tunnel vision is that the climate is almost exclusively controlled by changes in the amount of trace gases in the atmosphere. To this, they also add soot, effects from volcanic eruptions and from TSI Total Solar Irradiance which is the small variations of the heat radiation that is hitting Earth from the Sun. Instead of  calling their hypothesis AGW, I suggest that it should be called Exclusive Atmospheric Composition Driven Climate Change EACDCC.

Of course they want to fit or massage their computer simulations to follow the temperature variations that is occurring. This has been more and more difficult, if not right out impossible. Therefore they have resorted to massaging the temperature data. Just to give an illustration, it has been reveled in the e-mail correspondents that they have suggested that the none warming and cooling since 2000 could be attributed the increase in pollution coming from China and India. Of course nothing can convince them that their theory of C-AGW could be wrong. You see this in almost all science reporting coming from this community. Changes are allways coming from changing in the atmospheric composition, never from changes in ocean currents and absolutely not from changes in solar activity. The hockey-teams peer-review monitoring has made sure that paper with that sort of conclusions never get into any climatic scientific publication.

The Global Cooling Newsletter!

Sign up for The Global Cooling Newsletter!
It's FREE