|











|
 |
Global Warming Greatest Scam In
History!
John Coleman argues against global warming
| By John
Coleman, The Founder
of The Weather Channel
It is the greatest scam in
history. I am amazed, appalled and highly
offended by it. Global Warming; It is a
SCAM.
Some dastardly scientists with environmental
and political motives manipulated long term
scientific data back in the late 1990's to
create an allusion of rapid global warming.
Other scientists of the same environmental
wacko type jumped into the circle to support
and broaden the "research" to further enhance
the totally slanted, bogus global warming
claims. Their friends in government steered
huge research grants their way to keep the
movement going. Soon they claimed to be a
consensus.
Environmental extremist, notable politicians
among them then teamed up with movie, media
and other liberal, environmentalist
journalists to create this wild "scientific"
scenario of the civilization threatening
environmental consequences from Global Warming
unless we adhere to their radical agenda.
Now their ridicules manipulated science has
been accepted as fact and become a cornerstone
issue for CNN, CBS, NBC, the Democratic
Political Party, the Governor of California,
school teachers and, in many cases, well
informed but very gullible environmental
conscientious citizens. Only one reporter at
ABC has been allowed to counter the Global
Warming frenzy with one 15 minutes documentary
segment.
I do not oppose environmentalism. I do not
oppose the political positions of either
party.
However, Global Warming, i.e. Climate Change,
is not about environmentalism or politics. It
is not a religion. It is not something you
"believe in." It is science; the science of
meteorology. This is my field of life-long
expertise. And I am telling you Global Warming
is a nonevent, a manufactured crisis and a
total scam. I say this knowing you probably
won't believe me, a mere TV weatherman,
challenging a Nobel Prize, Academy Award and
Emmy Award winning former Vice President of
United States. So be it.
I suspect you might like to say to me, "John,
look the research that supports the case for
global warming was done by research
scientists; people with PH D's in Meteorology.
They are employed by major universities and
important research institutions. Their work
has been reviewed by other scientists with PH
D's. They have to know a lot more about it
than you do. Come on, John, get with it. The
experts say our pollution has created an
strong and increasing greenhouse effect and a
rapid, out of control global warming is
underway that will sky rocket temperatures,
destroy agriculture, melt the ice caps, flood
the coastlines and end life as we know it. How
can you dissent from this crisis? You must be
a bit nutty.
Allow me, please, to explain how I think this
all came about. Our universities have become
somewhat isolated from the rest of us. There
is a culture and attitudes and values and
pressures on campus that are very different. I
know this group well. My father and my older
brother were both PHD-University types. I was
raised in the university culture. Any person
who spends a decade at a university obtaining
a PHD in Meteorology and become a research
scientist, more likely than not, becomes a
part of that single minded culture. They all
look askance at the rest of us, certain of
their superiority. They respect government and
disrespect business, particularly big
business. They are environmentalists above all
else.
And, there is something else. These scientists
know that if they do research and results are
in no way alarming, their research will gather
dust on the shelf and their research careers
will languish. But if they do research that
sounds alarms, they will become well known and
respected and receive scholarly awards and,
very importantly, more research dollars will
come flooding their way.
So when these researchers did climate change
studies in the late 90's they were eager to
produce findings that would be important and
be widely noticed and trigger more research
funding. It was easy for them to manipulate
the data to come up with the results they
wanted to make headlines and at the same time
drive their environmental agendas. Then their
like minded PHD colleagues reviewed their work
and hastened to endorse it without question.
There were a few who didn't fit the mold. They
did ask questions and raised objections. They
did research with contradictory results. The
environmental elitists berated them brushed
their studies aside.
I have learned since the Ice Age is coming
scare in the 1970's to always be a skeptic
about research. In the case of global warming,
I didn't accept media accounts. Instead I read
dozens of the scientific papers. I have talked
with numerous scientists. I have studied. I
have thought about it. I know I am correct
when I assure you there is no run away climate
change. The impact of humans on climate is not
catastrophic. Our planet is not in peril. It
is all a scam, the result of bad science.
I am not alone in this assessment. There are
hundreds of other meteorologists, many of them
PH D's, who are as certain as I am that this
global warming frenzy is based on bad science
and is not valid.
I am incensed by the incredible media glamour,
the politically correct silliness and rude
dismal of counter arguments by the high priest
of Global Warming.
In time, a decade or two, the outrageous scam
will be obvious. As the temperature rises,
polar ice cap melting, coastal flooding and
super storm pattern all fail to occur as
predicted everyone will come to realize we
have been duped.
The sky is not falling. And, natural cycles
and drifts in climate are as much if not more
responsible for any climate changes underway.
I strongly believe that the next twenty years
are equally as likely to see a cooling trend
as they are to see a warming trend. |
Interview with John Coleman
Visit John's
forecast blog
|
|
 |
|
Copyright © 2007-2008 Per Strandberg, Voss,
Norway |
Top · Home ·
Contact
|
|
|