Global Warming Greatest Scam In History!

John Coleman argues against global warming

By John Coleman, The Founder of The Weather Channel
It is the greatest scam in history. I am amazed, appalled and highly offended by it. Global Warming; It is a SCAM.

Some dastardly scientists with environmental and political motives manipulated long term scientific data back in the late 1990's to create an allusion of rapid global warming. Other scientists of the same environmental wacko type jumped into the circle to support and broaden the "research" to further enhance the totally slanted, bogus global warming claims. Their friends in government steered huge research grants their way to keep the movement going. Soon they claimed to be a consensus.

Environmental extremist, notable politicians among them then teamed up with movie, media and other liberal, environmentalist journalists to create this wild "scientific" scenario of the civilization threatening environmental consequences from Global Warming unless we adhere to their radical agenda.

Now their ridicules manipulated science has been accepted as fact and become a cornerstone issue for CNN, CBS, NBC, the Democratic Political Party, the Governor of California, school teachers and, in many cases, well informed but very gullible environmental conscientious citizens. Only one reporter at ABC has been allowed to counter the Global Warming frenzy with one 15 minutes documentary segment.

I do not oppose environmentalism. I do not oppose the political positions of either party.

However, Global Warming, i.e. Climate Change, is not about environmentalism or politics. It is not a religion. It is not something you "believe in." It is science; the science of meteorology. This is my field of life-long expertise. And I am telling you Global Warming is a nonevent, a manufactured crisis and a total scam. I say this knowing you probably won't believe me, a mere TV weatherman, challenging a Nobel Prize, Academy Award and Emmy Award winning former Vice President of United States. So be it.

I suspect you might like to say to me, "John, look the research that supports the case for global warming was done by research scientists; people with
PH D's in Meteorology. They are employed by major universities and important research institutions. Their work has been reviewed by other scientists with PH D's. They have to know a lot more about it than you do. Come on, John, get with it. The experts say our pollution has created an strong and increasing greenhouse effect and a rapid, out of control global warming is underway that will sky rocket temperatures, destroy agriculture, melt the ice caps, flood the coastlines and end life as we know it. How can you dissent from this crisis? You must be a bit nutty.

Allow me, please, to explain how I think this all came about. Our universities have become somewhat isolated from the rest of us. There is a culture and attitudes and values and pressures on campus that are very different. I know this group well. My father and my older brother were both PHD-University types. I was raised in the university culture. Any person who spends a decade at a university obtaining a PHD in Meteorology and become a research scientist, more likely than not, becomes a part of that single minded culture. They all look askance at the rest of us, certain of their superiority. They respect government and disrespect business, particularly big business. They are environmentalists above all else.

And, there is something else. These scientists know that if they do research and results are in no way alarming, their research will gather dust on the shelf and their research careers will languish. But if they do research that sounds alarms, they will become well known and respected and receive scholarly awards and, very importantly, more research dollars will come flooding their way.

So when these researchers did climate change studies in the late 90's they were eager to produce findings that would be important and be widely noticed and trigger more research funding. It was easy for them to manipulate the data to come up with the results they wanted to make headlines and at the same time drive their environmental agendas. Then their like minded PHD colleagues reviewed their work and hastened to endorse it without question.

There were a few who didn't fit the mold. They did ask questions and raised objections. They did research with contradictory results. The environmental elitists berated them brushed their studies aside.

I have learned since the Ice Age is coming scare in the 1970's to always be a skeptic about research. In the case of global warming, I didn't accept media accounts. Instead I read dozens of the scientific papers. I have talked with numerous scientists. I have studied. I have thought about it. I know I am correct when I assure you there is no run away climate change. The impact of humans on climate is not catastrophic. Our planet is not in peril. It is all a scam, the result of bad science.

I am not alone in this assessment. There are hundreds of other meteorologists, many of them PH D's, who are as certain as I am that this global warming frenzy is based on bad science and is not valid.

I am incensed by the incredible media glamour, the politically correct silliness and rude dismal of counter arguments by the high priest of Global Warming.

In time, a decade or two, the outrageous scam will be obvious. As the temperature rises, polar ice cap melting, coastal flooding and super storm pattern all fail to occur as predicted everyone will come to realize we have been duped.

The sky is not falling. And, natural cycles and drifts in climate are as much if not more responsible for any climate changes underway.

I strongly believe that the next twenty years are equally as likely to see a cooling trend as they are to see a warming trend.

Interview with John Coleman

Another argument against global warming is that the climate scientists who build climate models has been unable to find the most important drivers for El Niño / La Niña or what is scientifically also called ENSO.

Their ENSO forecast models are only capable of making reasonable correct forecasts for a few months in advance. I’ve cracked the code behind the underlining forces which cause changes in the ENSO index. In other words, I can predict when El Niño or La Niña happens years in advance. The drivers for ENSO changes are variations in the tidal forcing and variations in Sun’s electromagnetic activity!

ENSO El Niño  forecast 2016 July

This is my latest ENSO forecast

Why is this an argument against dangerous human caused global warming?

 As amazing as it sounds, despite all the manpower and money that has been put in, trying to find out what it is that cause changes of ENSO, which is the most important weather phenomena in this planet, all these people has failed to identifying the main forces that triggers this phenomena.

But, I have!

The reasons for this are several. One: They build ENSO models which ignores outside forces. In other words, they suffer from what I call, the black box syndrome. Two: these forces are hard to find because they are weak and the response time can vary. Three: They don’t feel comfortable looking outside their comfort zone going into other areas of science.

In fact, ENSO is on a yearly basis the dominant global temperature force. Some have concluded that of the last 50 years’ temperature change, ENSO is responsible for at least half. The climate scare is in large part based on scary climate models which fail to follow real world. There are good correlations between changes in the Sun’s electromagnetic variability and temperature variations in Earth.

Yet, the climate community is stonewalling when it comes to including any aspects of the Sun’s electromagnetic variability into their models. Because the climate community has not included electromagnetic solar activity which shows good correlations with variations of Earth’s temperature but instead assume trace gases such as CO2, Methane and aerosols as the main temperature drives, despite no empirical evidence in the real-world that show that that is the case, these climate models predictions are false.