The global warming swindle is now sold on DVD.
A documentary dealing with natural science is not normally
a hot seller on DVD.
Yet, apparently The Global Warming Gestapo Thought Police
have swung into action and are now trying to stop the film
from reaching the public on DVD as they regard this as a
very dangerous threat.
Of course this just only gives more credibility to the
documentary arguments as it exposes the mentality and
mindset of leading climatologists as they try to impose
totalitarian scientific censorship.
Fascinating!
The Great Global Warming Swindle which was aired in March
2007 on British Channel4 created a strong reaction from
climatologists and they accused the program to be full of
errors. That would be expected given the low level
rhetoric of this infected "sandbox war" type of debate.
So what did they do?
They released this document called
Misrepresentation of
science evidence.
In it they list a number of claims that they claim the
program claims which they regard as such serious and
fundamental errors as it not in the public interest that
this program should be distributed or aired.
OK!
Some of these errors, which I agree on, are that the
temperature reconstruction from the last century was
slightly altered. Although the main features were correct.
Also the claim that CO2 is an insignificant greenhouse gas
is wrong and that manmade contribution of CO2 is small is
also false.
The claim that the temperature in the lower troposphere is
cooling is in dispute.
However after reviewing the claims of the huge
misinterpretation in the films, I cannot stop to be
amazed by the claim of this letter.
It seems to me that
most of the signatories seemed not to have watched the
documentary at all. Instead they seem to have signed the letter on
hearsay.
Among some of the claims there are claims the writers
claim that were claimed in TV program which were in fact
not claimed in the program at all.
One of the more surprising objection in the letter was that
as one of the major claimed misrepresentation of it was that the temperature was higher during the
medieval
warm period than it is now. To claim that the climate was
warmer when historical records show that wine were produced
in Northern England and Scandinavian lived on agriculture
on Greenland is apparently a major misrepresentation and
should not be discussed. Yet they say that they are open
to free debate and against censorship in this letter they
sent to OFCOM.
Amazing!!
So which films are most misleading?
Al Gore’s movie in which the only data he uses as
scientific proof to show the conclusion that the release
of manmade greenhouse gases will soon lead to a climate
catastrophe are all false. Not only that, they are
misleading and deceptive and manipulate the public.
Or
The Great Global Warming Swindle. In which some of the
scientific data were not completely accurate. A part of these
errors were later corrected by the producer of this
documentary.
This program is unique as it discusses other important
aspect about global warming and the man-made greenhouse
theory and its relation with the scientists that promote
it. The climatologists are not able to attack these aspects as they are
unable to do that, because these claims are true.
It's these revealing facts and not the scientific
information the signatures of the letters really want to censure and stop from reaching the
public. Because if this information would be able to spread
among the public it would be a threat to their
huge public funding.
By the way, of the signatories about half
of them were biologists and the other half climatologists,
meteorologists or hydrologists..
The claims in the TV film which they intend to stop are
listed here:
 |
Not all scientist that participate as authors of the IPCC
agree on anthropogenic cause for the resent climate
change.
|
|
IPCC is a political UN organization.
|
|
There are
many non scientists among the claimed scientists in the IPCC list.
|
|
The huge sums of money have distorted and corrupted this
field of science.
|
|
Global warming has become a huge industry employing large
number of scientist and public servants as well as
business people. Nearly 6000 delegates and journalists
participated in a recent conference in Nairobi. I recently
read that about 50 000 scientists will participate in the
International Polar Year 2007-2008, many of them climatologists.
|
|
Apart from small changes in the irradiance
change of the Sun, the Sun as a factor in climatology has
disappeared as an important factor from the climate research.
|
|
The close correlation between the Sun's
magnetic activity and climate are being ignored.
|
|
There exists today extreme hostility against anyone who
claims that there are other causes for the current global
warming than human caused greenhouse gases, killing any
scientific open debate.
|
|
Anthropogenic global warming has almost become a religion
so that now most climatologists are on a quest to prove
one specific theory rather than doing honest and good
research looking for the truth.
|
|
To deliver extreme catastrophic prediction is good for
funding, promotion and status in this field.
|
|
To be critical about anthropogenic catastrophic warming is
bad for funding, promotion and status.
|
|
Extreme climate predictions make it easier
to get scientific paper published in peer review journals.
|
|
Environment journalists from the main news
media crave for catastrophic climate predictions as they
make good headlines and news.
|
|
The show shows that not all climatologists are as united
as they claimed to be.
|
|
There is no historical proof in recent history that CO2
have changed the climate.
|
|
This manmade global warming theory got promoted in the mid
1980 by Margaret Thatcher who have a B.Sc degree in
chemistry and by ”influential decision making think tank
groups”. The field of climatology started to receive
massive funding during that time.
|
|
The funding shut up by more than 10 times,
during that time.
|
|
To mention global warming in other fields
of natural
science is good for funding.
|
|
Climate models are unreliable especially
while they are only based on the theory of heat trapping
greenhouse gases or cool trapping aerosols while disregard
effects from the Sun. They are further subjected to uncertainties from
complicated effects and causes of cloud formation and
changes of sea currents.
|
|
Warmer weather means less temperature differences between
the tropics and the poles which results in fewer storms
not more storm as the climatologists’ claim.
|
|
Untrue claims for the spread of tropical
diseases is made
by the IPCC.
|
|
Critics of the global warming greenhouse theory are now
compared to holocaust deniers. |
